mrstotten: Avengers: Tony and Steve, "Keep staring, pretty boy. I might do a trick." (Default)
mrstotten ([personal profile] mrstotten) wrote2010-08-09 08:27 am

Sherlock Episode reaction Spoilers for 1.03

Ok so last night was met with mixed reaction, Glee cos it is new Sherlock and total horror because it is the last episode until god only knows when. I was so upset I emailed my friend Lauren who is a Production Accountant with the BBC Scotland to find out if/when, but haven't heard back.

I am not even going to lie this part of the episode reaction has a HEAVY SLASH BIAS!! because although I don't see them getting together any time soon, even the shows producers must realise it is written to show that Watson has a total fangirl crush on Holmes with the whole "You're brilliant" but what is even more obvious is Holmes very swiftly growing crush on Watson and his is much less fangirly. He stood up to watch John leave, and the look on his face was almost heartbreaking. It bothers him when John is disappointed in him. but the main decider for me was through some of the most horrific moments ever when a group of people, including a traumatised woman and man, a frail older woman and a bloody KID were being held hostage strapped to a BOMB!!! he remained detached and as bad as it sounds enjoying it. It was all about beating the nemesis NEVER the victim, until the victim was John, I mean did anyone think Sherlock enjoyed the last part??? Even though he was getting his wish and finally meeting his nemesis face to face??? Also the whole "I'm going to burn the heart right out of you" Seriously does anyone else believe that WASN'T about John??? So my end conclusion was that Sherlock is most definitely falling for John hard, this may be my slash goggles but even my hubby noticed the gigantic one sided crush and he is slash blind. I don't think John is in the same place at ALL at the moment, but as Moriarty stated, he did most certainly show his hand when he first tried to save Sherlock by jumping on the person controlling the bloody bomb strapped to him, but also when he stepped straight back into the bullets line sight when the it was switched to Sherlock. So yes, I think the slash has taken in whole new meanings of sub text in this show, but would love others opinions?

Now onto the actual episode. I enjoyed it in a slightly horrifying way, it wasn't so much a nail biter as it was a "seriously has anyone noticed that Sherlock is a sociopath?" reaction but I love that John kept calling him on it, that he seems to have taken up the role of Sherlock's moral compass because as much as I love the show, Sherlock had me seriously worried in this ep, the line between him and Moriarty was practically non existent. It was good to see Lestrade back, I missed him last week, really didn't like the other guy as much. The story was predictable enough that both me and Robert guessed a lot of the twists and turns before they happened so not great, but the character development did take a big step forward in my opinion. John finally started voicing his concerns, working on his own away from Sherlock, and Sherlock started to actually look like he may one day consider someone elses viewpoints and his icy veneer definitely cracked a little.

Moriarty I'm mixed on, yes I liked him, found his manners and voice and delicious creepiness very entertaining but also found the Jim from IT guy a stretch too far I mean I just kept saying the IT GUY!!! seriously??? the worlds foremost master criminal is the IT GUY!!!! seriously???

However hubby found it both believable and very clever, he thinks that Moriarty has been obsessed with Sherlock since he first started making waves about that murder all those years ago and that it would be very believable for him to take on a position where he could study his prey first hand. Me I just kept saying cmon :P

As to the end????? I just bloody knew it was going to be a cliffhanger, I KNEW it *kicks the BBC* at least they do now seem to be commissioning more episodes but seriously, they were originally just going to leave us hanging like that!!!! Forever!! I think I would have started some sort of protest outside their offices if new episodes hadn't been commissioned.

What I'd like to see next year? Better woman characters, I mean we have four, one is John's semi love interest, one has a massive dorky crush on Sherlock and is usually the butt of his jokes, one works for Mycroft and does nothing but text and look sultry!!!!! and the last is a bitch who hates him, I expect more from the BBC, give us some really good kick ass villains!!!! and bring in Harry Watson!!! I for one would love to see more of her. some slightly tighter plots, the first three were good don;t get me wrong, but could be a lot more intricate and harder to guess at, I want to marvel at Sherlock's genius the same way John does!!

Ok so over to you guys, thoughts? opinions? Did you love it or hate it?

[identity profile] idyllsoflife.livejournal.com 2010-08-09 12:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, I've started an essay here...

They mentioned that if they did do more eps, the creators wouldn't be as involved....which for me, I'd rather have at least as good as the first and second eps or no episodes at all. I hate it when a series just goes downhill. I much prefer ending strong even if it's not resolved. Because then you can always speculate on the awesomeness.

I strongly agree with the female characters thing (although you forgot Mrs. Hudson). Maybe they could have Donovan do something bamf? Sarah seemed like she was going to be awesome when she took out that Chinese dude they were fighting, but then they had to have the whole crying, helpless woman hostage scene...

I feel like the Harry problem and the good woman characters problem can be solved in one. Make HARRY awesome even though she's an alcoholic. Although that might makes suggestions about the strength of het and/or lesbians if the only good female character is a lesbian. IDK...

Also, I LOVE the slash and it is epic, but can anyone explain how they're able to get away with it? The 2009 movie's sequel was in trouble because the rights' holder for the last book threatened to take away the rights if they kept portraying H&W as gay. And this is much more blatant than the 2009 movie (really, I didn't see any slash in it. Holmes being mean to his fiance just came off as his usual jerkiness).

See this article here: http://www.filmbuffonline.com/FBOLNewsreel/wordpress/2010/01/03/will-gay-subtext-sink-holmes-sequel/

There are those articles about angry fans, but she hasn't threatened to take the rights away again. Are they no longer an issue? I know she only had rights for the last book because the rest have gone under public domain (at least in the US) Can an UKers help me out with how this works?
I hope this doesn't become and issue. The show without the slash would have less heart....also, the UK seems cooler about the gay this anyway. Especially since this is on mainstream TV and everything.

[identity profile] mrstotten.livejournal.com 2010-08-09 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
This is the first I have ever heard of this and it is surprising, like the article writer states this person doesn't seem to be as bothered about Holmes being a bare-knuckle boxer.

Maybe her rights have now run out? but that is an interesting one, as even though there was some slashy undertones in the film, it is much much more blatent in the series, I mean the discussion in the coffee shop in the first episode, to me was Sherlock admitting that he was gay, but that may just be the way I viewed it, funnily enough I have read all the books and I always got the slashy undertone from Watson, but thought that Sherlock was if anything asexual so I really don't get the 'keeping in the spirit of the books' argument she has.

[identity profile] piplover.livejournal.com 2010-08-09 02:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry, butting in to say that the lady has no rights over Sherlock Holmes, and has been proven in court three separate times to have no rights over Sherlock Holmes. It was all a kerflufle and didn't have any impact on the second episode being made or not. In fact, she released a statement saying she had never made such comments. Besides, if anyone reads the books, the slash is so apparent you don't even need goggles.